Calling All Fans!

Submit your video questions to be answered LIVE on Friday morning!

Submit

Market Measures

Monday – Friday | 9:00 – 9:20a CT

Portfolio Allocation for Strangles: Part 1

Market Measures

Options involve risk and are not suitable for all investors. Please read Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options before deciding to invest in options.

This morning we heard from Skip, our newest Rising Star. Among the many outstanding insights Skip shared was how he allocated his capital. Skip likes to sell premium using short Strangles and we do too. We decided to run a study on the ideal amount of capital to allocate to a short Strangle strategy. What is the percentage? We can take the number generated by our study and plug it into a formula that takes the size of the account, multiplies it by the target capital allocation percentage and the divides that by the Buying Power Reduction (BPR) of one contract to determine the number of contracts we should use. An example using a $1 million dollar account was provided.

Our study was conducted in the SPY (S&P 500 ETF) using data from 2005 to the present. We sold the 1 Standard Deviation (SD) Strangles using the option expiration cycle closest to 45 Days To Expiration (DTE). We only opened a new position after closing the old one. We then compared strategies of allocating 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30% 35% and 50% of the capital. We then compared this to a simple buy-and-hold strategy in the SPY including the dividends.

An 11 year results graph of the study results showed that short Strangles held through expiration was profitable but did not outperform a buy and hold strategy in SPY. The graph further showed that allocating too much capital (50%) exposed the account to too much risk during large drawdowns such as in late 2008. A second results graph showed that when the short Strangles were managed at 50% of max profit that all but the 10% and 15% capital allocations beat buy and hold and that the 35% allocation performed the best. Tom and Tony pointed out that we would expect that if we filtered for instances of higher IV Rank (IVR) our Strangles may have performed even better. Tom noted, “If you over commit your capital and you don't manage winners then you underperform. When you stay mechanical, you knock it out of the ball park.”

For more information on Capital Allocation see:

Watch this segment of Market Measures with Tom Sosnoff and Tony Battista for the valuable takeaways and the detailed results of our study on the optimal percentage of capital to allocate to a short Strangle strategy.

Market Measures More installments

See All »

Latest tastytrade Videos As of October 18

Most Shared From the last 30 days