IVR and Non-Traditional Diversification
Oct 4, 2017
Given the relative youth of volatility trading in the overall history of the financial markets, the term "nontraditional" fits quite well when describing the approach.
In turn, that means strategic thinking related to volatility portfolios also requires, at times, an innovative mindset.
For traders seeking to expand their thinking, a recent episode of Market Measures is worth a look. Data on the episode is presented that can help traders analyze their volatility portfolios from a fresh perspective.
Historically, the term "diversification" has been used in portfolio theory to describe the process of allocating capital such that exposure to concentrated risk is reduced.
While the practical application of this methodology certainly varies by investor, traditional diversification typically calls for the spreading of exposure across and within asset classes. Some examples of traditional portfolio diversification include:
Stocks vs. Bonds
Small cap vs. Large cap
Growth vs. Value
USA vs. International
On this episode of Market Measures, the team considers diversification as it relates to a volatility portfolio.
Volatility trading obviously revolves around implied volatility and mean reversion. In this regard, it is statistically-based, meaning that trade ideas are discovered using metrics such as Implied Volatility Rank (IVR).
IVR tells us whether implied volatility is high or low in a specific underlying based on the past year of data. For example, if implied volatility in XYZ has been between 30 and 60 during the previous 52 weeks, then an implied volatility of 45 would equate to an IVR of 50%. Likewise, an implied volatility of 60 would equate to an IVR of 100%.
At tastytrade, we look for opportunities to sell volatility when IVR is above 50%, and for opportunities to buy volatility when IVR is below 50%.
Getting back to the episode, the Market Measures team designed a study to better understand how diversification relates to a volatility portfolio. In particular, the team wondered whether focusing on a large cap index, a small cap index, or a strategy that simply selected the highest IVR (between the two), produced the best results (historically).
To arrive at an answer to this question, a study was designed that used data from 2005 to present in the SPY (large cap) and IWM (small cap). Three strategies were then backtested, all of which sold 30 delta strangles:
Portfolio 1: 100% in IWM
Portfolio 2: 100% in SPY
Portfolio 3: Whichever Index ETF (SPY or IWM) had the highest IVR at the time
It should be noted that while implied volatility is almost always higher in IWM (as compared to SPY), implied volatility rank basically benchmarks each symbol individually against itself, and therefore allows for such a study/comparison.
The results of the study, including the performance of each portfolio, are compiled in the graphic below:
Looking at the above data, it's certainly notable to see that the combined portfolio produced the most attractive results in terms of success rate, average P/L, and return on capital (ROC).
While this particular study is by no means exhaustive, the results help illustrate that "diversification" likely has a different meaning and application in the volatility niche.
While it's always important to vet an underling when trading, this study helps emphasize how the relative attractiveness of a volatility trade often centers on implied volatility metrics, such as IVR, as opposed to methods used in a more traditional portfolio.
We encourage you to watch the complete episode of Market Measures focusing on nontraditional diversification when your schedule allows.
If you have any outstanding questions or comments, please leave us a message in the space below, or reach out directly at email@example.com.
We look forward to hearing from you!
Sage Anderson has an extensive background trading equity derivatives and managing volatility-based portfolios. He has traded hundreds of thousands of contracts across the spectrum of industries in the single-stock universe.
Options involve risk and are not suitable for all investors. Please read Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options before deciding to invest in options.
tastytrade content is provided solely by tastytrade, Inc. (“tastytrade”) and is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not, nor is it intended to be, trading or investment advice or a recommendation that any security, futures contract, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any person. Trading securities can involve high risk and the loss of any funds invested. tastytrade, through its content, financial programming or otherwise, does not provide investment or financial advice or make investment recommendations. Investment information provided may not be appropriate for all investors, and is provided without respect to individual investor financial sophistication, financial situation, investing time horizon or risk tolerance. tastytrade is not in the business of transacting securities trades, nor does it direct client commodity accounts or give commodity trading advice tailored to any particular client’s situation or investment objectives. Supporting documentation for any claims (including claims made on behalf of options programs), comparison, statistics, or other technical data, if applicable, will be supplied upon request. tastytrade is not a licensed financial advisor, registered investment advisor, or a registered broker-dealer. Options, futures and futures options are not suitable for all investors. Prior to trading securities products, please read the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options and the Risk Disclosure for Futures and Options found on tastyworks.com.
tastytrade is a trademark/servicemark owned by tastytrade.
tastyworks, Inc. ("tastyworks") is a registered broker-dealer and member of FINRA, NFA and SIPC. tastyworks offers self-directed brokerage accounts to its customers. tastyworks does not give financial or trading advice nor does it make investment recommendations. You alone are responsible for making your investment and trading decisions and for evaluating the merits and risks associated with the use of tastyworks’ systems, services or products. tastyworks is a wholly owned subsidiary of tastytrade, Inc (“tastytrade”).
tastyworks, Inc. (“tastyworks”) has entered into a Marketing Agreement with tastytrade (“Marketing Agent”) whereby tastyworks pays compensation to Marketing Agent to recommend tastyworks’ brokerage services. The existence of this Marketing Agreement should not be deemed as an endorsement or recommendation of Marketing Agent by tastyworks. tastytrade is the parent company of tastyworks. tastyworks and Marketing Agent are separate entities with their own products and services. tastytrade has different privacy policies than tastyworks.
Quiet Foundation, Inc. (“Quiet Foundation”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of tastytrade The information on quietfoundation.com is intended for U.S. residents only. All investing involves the risk of loss. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Quiet Foundation does not make suitability determinations, nor does it make investment recommendations. You alone are responsible for making your investment and trading decisions and for evaluating the merits and risks associated with the use of Quiet Foundation’s systems, services or products.